Heathrow Optimization

The Economist reports on “Heathrow Hell.” I generally agree, but I’ve found that the way to Heathrow Happiness, if you’re “redirecting” through Heathrow from the U.S., is to blow off the Transfer route if you’re transferring.

How do I do this? Upon arrival from the U.S., I’m supposed to turn right to get myself to the tranfer part of Heathrow. The first couple of times I did the SF -> Dublin journey via Virgin Atlantic, it never registered to make a right and go to Transfers, I just went straight for Arrivals. Technically, Arrivals are for people entering the UK. However I simply queued up, went through passport control to the underground from terminal 1 to 3 (or vice versa, can’t remember) walk the tunnel past the Underground station, check in at Aer Lingus and its multitude of kiosks, go through security, and go to the gate. No problems–you got a nice walk in, got to check out people in the tunnel, and generally it was a snap.

My most recent trip, I did the Arrival thing again but got stopped by a crusty curmudgeon who insisted that I go back to Transfers. I objected a little but followed his orders, because I realized that I had been probably breaking the rules and doubted my previous successful journeys. It sucked, because I had already spent a while in line and had to start over in an unknown. I should have pushed back but decided to queue properly as a good Brit would (despite the fact that everyone was going through Heathrow was probably a non-Brit). To my chagrin, I saw that people were queued up waiting for something–this something turned out to be a bus that took us to the other terminal.

After a while, I made it to the transfer area, which was flat-out miserable. I thought, “so this is what I’ve been missing.” It was crowded and infused with harried people freaking out and trying to make their flight. Instead of a multitude of check-in kiosks or desks like the departures area of the terminal, there was one single Aer Lingus rep who was dealing with people who were running late (I was not e-ticket). I was forced to submit myself to a single queue where I waited another half an hour for one agent to finally take care of me, at which time I missed my flight and had to wait two hours to get lucky with a standby flight.

I calculate that I lost 45 minutes to an hour via the transfer route instead of my regular, walk-to-the-terminal route. I had wondered why Heathrow caused people to complain. Heathrow appears oversubscribed as it stands, considering the Economist article, but I think a good deal of the pain is in this soul-sucking tranfer area.

My plan is to stick with the Arrivals trick. Any other tips or tricks for Heathrow?

Here’s one for Southwest–if you’re thirsty, rows 1, 9, and 17 are where drink service starts (three crew member take orders and delivers, heading back eight seats, from those positions) :)

Posted in Travel | 6 Comments

Nascent Site Todo

  1. Claim my Technorati Profile.
  2. Stop publishing everything as the category “Blogroll.”
  3. Change the composition template so the post title form have the words ‘I’m a Dummy Because I Didn’t Title This Post’ by default (if you publish without a title using wp-cache, the post number becomes the title)
  4. Use the word ‘nascent’ in a post.

Posted in Misc | 5 Comments

Endochrome

Wow, now this is some outside-the-box gameplay design! I’m not going to comment but instead will just link to this gameplay video of Endochrome, an apparent upcoming game title.

This reminds me of Half-Life 2 Portal.

Posted in Games | 1 Comment

Basic Website Savviness

Andy Beal takes issue with an article that puts SEO in a not-so-positive light. I’m neutral on the first part of the article, but the business owner interviewed goes on to say

…business owners need to be aware of what their internet staff are doing, because programmers are constantly learning new methods, new techniques and tips from each other and from the web. “They would not give a second thought to using this new but perhaps untested and dubious technique on your live website just to hone freshly acquired skills or to appear to be a bit more professional in their own minds.”

That’s an important point and I agree in spirit. I don’t agree that everyone is adding features and the latest tricks just as a resume-building activity, but I have heard in person, from feedback to Google, and in forums that site owners have employed someone who has taken unnecessary risks with their sites, only to find out after a removal from search engine results.

Overall, I think that the number of people working on websites who are willing to make risky changes is a small fraction. And, at the end of the day, one has to put a large amount of trust in those working for him or her. However, business owners can consider a few things with respect to their website to mitigate these risks.

Knowing the spirit of the quality guidelines of search engines, learning what techniques they frown upon, doing a thing or two to keep tabs on their site, and knowing where to get help, are all potentially worthwhile. It then becomes straightforward to touch base with staff on changes, or bring that knowledge to new proposals, to ask how well the work meshes with search engine guidelines. If the web designers, programmers, or SEOs they work with know that the site owner has a basic savviness, those doing the work might be less likely to employ risky techniques on a whim.

Posted in Google | 9 Comments

Spam Comes In All Forms

World of Warcraft players were recently treated to a show: Not only did they get a Fourth of July fireworks display, but also a hailstorm of gnomes. Those in control of the gnome(s) were using an exploit to teleport themselves into a position so that the accumulated deaths spelled out the name of a third-party gold broker website.

Gnome Spam

No word on whether or not the corpses had loot in the form of cookies attributed to an affiliate :)

(via waxy.org links)

Posted in Spam | 2 Comments

FAQs added to Google Webmaster Help Group

Adam and a host of other good folks have added some FAQs to our Google Webmaster Help Group.

Google Webmaster Help FAQs

These include a charter and tips on posting, as well as answers to common questions for Crawling, Indexing, and Ranking, and using Webmaster Tools. These FAQs cover a lot of topics that are brought up in postings on a repeat basis, so they’ll sure to be well referenced.

I have it on good authority that these FAQs are being translated for our different language versions of Google Webmaster Help.

Kudos all around to the team and to the active group participants who lend their experience and skill in helping others.

Posted in Google | 6 Comments