Comments on: Google Site Operator: an Ode to Thee /2007/04/27/google-site-operator-an-ode-to-thee/ Webspam, Google, Et Cetera Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:05:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: Fred from Google Webmaster forum /2007/04/27/google-site-operator-an-ode-to-thee/#comment-223 Fred from Google Webmaster forum Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:05:24 +0000 /2007/04/27/google-site-operator-an-ode-to-thee/#comment-223 Hi, Just as you have stated pretty good things about "site" operator, i would like to add a little bit about "filetype" operator which is very useful for searching specific file types on Google. for example consider the following dork which i use on a daily basis to fetch text files (proxy lists) out of Google search pages. Dork: intext:80 | 8080 intext:3124 | 3128 filetype:txt It will show only text files in the search results which are basically proxy lists :) Hope i added some value to this blog post. Hi,

Just as you have stated pretty good things about “site” operator, i would like to add a little bit about “filetype” operator which is very useful for searching specific file types on Google. for example consider the following dork which i use on a daily basis to fetch text files (proxy lists) out of Google search pages.

Dork:

intext:80 | 8080 intext:3124 | 3128 filetype:txt

It will show only text files in the search results which are basically proxy lists :)

Hope i added some value to this blog post.

]]> By: Brian /2007/04/27/google-site-operator-an-ode-to-thee/#comment-21 Brian Sun, 27 May 2007 20:11:21 +0000 /2007/04/27/google-site-operator-an-ode-to-thee/#comment-21 John, My site is very small right now, so the 33 estimated pages is right on the money :) But I have seen the same as you. I can't speculate on when we might do better at estimated results. Also, good point on the space between the colon and the domain name (or TLD, or domain name + subdirectory etc.). John,

My site is very small right now, so the 33 estimated pages is right on the money :) But I have seen the same as you. I can’t speculate on when we might do better at estimated results.

Also, good point on the space between the colon and the domain name (or TLD, or domain name + subdirectory etc.).

]]> By: JohnMu /2007/04/27/google-site-operator-an-ode-to-thee/#comment-18 JohnMu Sun, 27 May 2007 11:24:16 +0000 /2007/04/27/google-site-operator-an-ode-to-thee/#comment-18 Perhaps I'm jumping ahead, but I would love your insiders take on the "about" number, especially with regards to the site:-operator. Where does it come from, what does it mean, should we care or should we just look at the first 10 results and accept that there might be more (or maybe not)? I like to go to the last visible page of results ("&start=990") and check the numbers, I've seen such gems as (numbers above 10 are made up, but the order of magnitude is correct): "500-507 of about 0" (a lot of these lately) "500-507 of about 300" "500-507 of about 507" (would be optimal) "500-507 of about 900" "500-507 of about 500'000'000" (I love those) (these are with the extended results activated ("&filter=0")) Website owners love numbers. They love to see that their content is being treated with respect by Google :-) so they would really love to see "how many pages are currently indexed". They're also afraid of the supplemental index - they'd love to see "how many pages are only in the supplemental index". Ah, and while you're with the site:-operator, just like the link:-operator people need to remember that a "space" between the ":" (colon) and the domain name breaks the operator. I can't mention it enough - http://webmastershelp.iblogget.com/2007/03/09/where-did-my-links-go/ . A lot of newer webmasters make that mistake. It would be great if Google could put an info-box up there when people do this kind of query "did you mean 'site:domain.com' to show the indexed pages?". Perhaps I’m jumping ahead, but I would love your insiders take on the “about” number, especially with regards to the site:-operator. Where does it come from, what does it mean, should we care or should we just look at the first 10 results and accept that there might be more (or maybe not)?

I like to go to the last visible page of results (“&start=990″) and check the numbers, I’ve seen such gems as (numbers above 10 are made up, but the order of magnitude is correct):
“500-507 of about 0″ (a lot of these lately)
“500-507 of about 300″
“500-507 of about 507″ (would be optimal)
“500-507 of about 900″
“500-507 of about 500’000’000″ (I love those)
(these are with the extended results activated (“&filter=0″))

Website owners love numbers. They love to see that their content is being treated with respect by Google :-) so they would really love to see “how many pages are currently indexed”. They’re also afraid of the supplemental index – they’d love to see “how many pages are only in the supplemental index”.

Ah, and while you’re with the site:-operator, just like the link:-operator people need to remember that a “space” between the “:” (colon) and the domain name breaks the operator. I can’t mention it enough – http://webmastershelp.iblogget.com/2007/03/09/where-did-my-links-go/ . A lot of newer webmasters make that mistake. It would be great if Google could put an info-box up there when people do this kind of query “did you mean ‘site:domain.com’ to show the indexed pages?”.

]]>